Muslims victims of European double-standards: Turkish opposition politician
Dogu Perincek stands outside ECHR in Starsbourg, France - Kate for thecairopost
By

STRASBOURG, France: “Tolerance towards Muslims in Europe equates to peace in Europe.”

Dogu Perincek, a Turkish opposition politician who recently had a travel ban lifted by Ankara, traveled to Strasbourg last week to defend himself in a case at the European Court for Human Rights (ECHR,) in which he was charged with denying what is known as the Armenian Genocide. The Cairo Post spoke with him about the case, the final ruling of which is expected in the coming months.

“The key of this case is tolerance and freedom for Muslim and Turkish people in Europe,” said Perincek, the head of the Turkish Workers Party. “Once there was a certain point of view, a judgment on the Jews during Hitler’s time, not only in Germany but in all the countries and regions that were conquered by Hitler, Jews were discriminated against. Now the same discrimination happens against the Muslims and Turkish people.”

His legal battle began in 2005, after describing calling the genocide an “international lie” at a conference in Switzerland. He was sentenced to 90 days in prison in 2007 by a Swiss court, which considered the remarks hate speech. Perincek appealed the ruling to the ECHR, which found in his favor in 2013. Geneva challenged the ruling, and a final hearing was held Jan. 28 at the court.

Perincek does not dispute mass killings and displacements of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire during 1915-1923, but contests that the violence came from both sides, and was carried out during wartime, and cannot as such be considered genocide. The ECHR agreed with his right to question the historical character of the events, and said that for his remarks to qualify as incitement there would have to be a racial character to his remarks. .

The attention on his case, he said, was motivated by discrimination towards Muslims, rather than protecting the principle of the Armenian Genocide, and noted recent marches in France in support of the freedom of expression.

“At the end, what has been lived in the context of the attack on Charlie Hebdo, and the events on the discussion about the so-called Armenian Genocide, are at the end connected,” he said.

“We are strictly condemning the killing of the policemen and the cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo, but if you look at the results, then we see that after the attack a discriminatory atmosphere has been developed towards Muslims.”

“In the context of genocide there is a prejudice which has turned into a hard prejudice. In WWI from 1914-1918, there it was first developed, from the two sides in the war. French, England and Russia were one side and they were saying the Turks were committing massacres as war propaganda,” Perincek said, adding “In the end, we should not like to think that the Turkish people would like a certain treatment, when you limit of expression then everybody is being limited.”

“The freedom of expression or opinion, at the core, is freedom for the opposing, or differing opinion. For example, to say ‘long live the king’ does not need freedom of expression. But to be able to say ‘The king is naked’ you need liberty.”

Recommend to friends

Comments

  1. ali ahmed from algeria
    February 2, 2015 at 5:08 pm

    The Armenians killed in 1915 (with the help of the Russians) more than 500 000 Muslims in eastern Turkey.

  2. ali ahmed from Algeria
    February 2, 2015 at 5:10 pm

    The Armenian “genocide” is a lie .. the armenians killed in 1992 more then 630 people (childs women and old men..) in Khojaly in azerbaijan and occupied until now 20 per cent of azeri lands ..

  3. John Aramian
    February 3, 2015 at 9:25 am

    So basically you are just another mouthpiece of a proven racist and hate-filled xenophobe like Perincek and the turkish ultra nationalist radicals.

    Funny how you and him play the victim, and demand “freedom of speech” while conveniently ignoring the fact that there is NO freedom of speech in turkey and their penal code criminalizes mentions of the Armenian Genocide ( a historic fact, and the event that led to the coining of the word genocide) a as a result journalist Hrant Dink was prosecuted and then assassinated.
    Some people also acted like mouthpiece for nazis and hitler, and tried to justify their actions, look where are they today and how history remembers them. Keep that in mind before you post such articles portraying a racist thug like Perincek as a victim.
    Or don’t. Censor this comment and assume the world is unaware.

Leave a comment